Skip to content

feat: implement Timeline Preview with caching and parallel timeline support#167

Open
OMpawar-21 wants to merge 4 commits intodevelopmentfrom
fix/timeline-preview-issue
Open

feat: implement Timeline Preview with caching and parallel timeline support#167
OMpawar-21 wants to merge 4 commits intodevelopmentfrom
fix/timeline-preview-issue

Conversation

@OMpawar-21
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Add Timeline Preview support with intelligent caching and client forking

  • Add PreviewTimestamp and ReleaseId properties to LivePreviewConfig
  • Implement fingerprint-based caching to eliminate redundant API calls
  • Add Fork() method for isolated timeline contexts enabling parallel comparisons
  • Add ResetLivePreview() method to clear timeline state
  • Enhance Entry.Fetch() with timeline-aware caching and network requests
  • Support preview_timestamp and release_id headers in live preview requests

This enables developers to view content as it appeared at any specific
timestamp or release, compare multiple timelines simultaneously, and
significantly reduces API calls through intelligent response caching.

sunil-lakshman and others added 2 commits April 16, 2026 14:23
…upport

Add preview_timestamp/release_id support, fingerprint-based caching,
and Fork() method for isolated timeline contexts. Enables viewing
historical content states and parallel timeline comparisons.
@OMpawar-21 OMpawar-21 requested a review from a team as a code owner April 20, 2026 14:36
@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 0 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 0 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@OMpawar-21 OMpawar-21 changed the base branch from fix/timeline-preview to development April 20, 2026 15:08
Copy link
Copy Markdown

@netrajpatel netrajpatel left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

@OMpawar-21 Please fix the GH workflow failures

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 0 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 0 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

@github-actions
Copy link
Copy Markdown

🔒 Security Scan Results

ℹ️ Note: Only vulnerabilities with available fixes (upgrades or patches) are counted toward thresholds.

Check Type Count (with fixes) Without fixes Threshold Result
🔴 Critical Severity 0 0 10 ✅ Passed
🟠 High Severity 0 0 25 ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium Severity 0 0 500 ✅ Passed
🔵 Low Severity 0 0 1000 ✅ Passed

⏱️ SLA Breach Summary

✅ No SLA breaches detected. All vulnerabilities are within acceptable time thresholds.

Severity Breaches (with fixes) Breaches (no fixes) SLA Threshold (with/no fixes) Status
🔴 Critical 0 0 15 / 30 days ✅ Passed
🟠 High 0 0 30 / 120 days ✅ Passed
🟡 Medium 0 0 90 / 365 days ✅ Passed
🔵 Low 0 0 180 / 365 days ✅ Passed

✅ BUILD PASSED - All security checks passed

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

None yet

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants