Skip to content

[IMP] mrp: split and merge MOs#17469

Open
erjer-odoo wants to merge 1 commit intosaas-19.1from
saas-19.1-mrp-split-merge-mos-erjer
Open

[IMP] mrp: split and merge MOs#17469
erjer-odoo wants to merge 1 commit intosaas-19.1from
saas-19.1-mrp-split-merge-mos-erjer

Conversation

@erjer-odoo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

Task card.

  • Set up replacements for "manufacturing order(s)" and "bill of materials" throughout article
  • Update for functionality in 19.1
  • New "Change Quantity to Produce" split button documentation
  • Update screenshots according to most recent guidelines

This saas-19.1 PR can be FWP up to saas-19.2. There are further upcoming changes for the next release that will be documented in a separate PR.

@erjer-odoo erjer-odoo requested a review from larm-odoo April 20, 2026 23:36
@erjer-odoo erjer-odoo self-assigned this Apr 20, 2026
@erjer-odoo erjer-odoo added the 3 label Apr 20, 2026
@robodoo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Collaborator

robodoo commented Apr 20, 2026

Pull request status dashboard

@erjer-odoo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @larm-odoo -- this PR is ready for review when you have a moment. Thank you!

@C3POdoo C3POdoo requested a review from a team April 20, 2026 23:38
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor

@larm-odoo larm-odoo left a comment

Choose a reason for hiding this comment

The reason will be displayed to describe this comment to others. Learn more.

Hi @erjer-odoo - great job with this! The info was concise, easy to follow, and straightforward.

All my comments are suggestions, nothing is needed, honestly.

I would recommend possibly adding a small sentence in the beginning of the two different sections that explain how to split the orders and the section to merge, just to provide a little bit of context as to why they would.. It sounded like the second one was more from a "we made a few but ran out of time, so we need to split" situation, and the first could be from.. forecasting? Not sure, but if there were solid examples of why you would use one vs the other, that would really add some more punch (but it's optional). Nice work - approved because you can handle the changes/comments =)

Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Comment thread content/applications/inventory_and_mrp/manufacturing/workflows/split_merge.rst Outdated
Co-authored-by: larm-odoo <121518652+larm-odoo@users.noreply.github.com>
@erjer-odoo erjer-odoo force-pushed the saas-19.1-mrp-split-merge-mos-erjer branch from cfac1cd to a688b80 Compare April 22, 2026 21:09
@erjer-odoo erjer-odoo requested a review from Felicious April 22, 2026 21:09
@erjer-odoo
Copy link
Copy Markdown
Contributor Author

Hi @Felicious -- this PR is ready for final review when you have a moment. Thank you!

Sign up for free to join this conversation on GitHub. Already have an account? Sign in to comment

Labels

Projects

None yet

Development

Successfully merging this pull request may close these issues.

3 participants